This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0008-5472.CAN-06-4122v1 66/24/11540    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Herberman, R. B. Articles by Alberts, D. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Herberman, R. B. Articles by Alberts, D. S.

Cancer Chemoprevention and Cancer Preventive Vaccines—A Call to Action: Leaders of Diverse Stakeholder Groups Present Strategies for Overcoming Multiple Barriers to Meet an Urgent Need

¹ University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; ² Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; ³ M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; ⁴ Milliman, Inc., New York, New York; and ⁵ University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona

Abstract

The emerging field of cancer prevention through chemoprevention agents and cancer vaccines offers significant promise for reducing suffering and death from cancer. However, that promise may not be kept unless major barriers to progress are lowered or eliminated. Among the most significant barriers are the relatively small investment from government and industry in research and development of cancer preventive agents; a predominant emphasis of translational cancer research on therapeutic interventions for metastatic or advanced cancer; complexities of prevention trial design; a relatively uncharted Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval process for preventive agents; insufficient public and patient understanding of the importance and potential for cancer preventive measures, with consequent unpredictable public and patient willingness to take preventive agents; an uncertain reimbursement from payors; and limitations in patent law, liability protection, and data package exclusivity that undermine the opportunity for recouping investment. Viewed individually or collectively, each of these barriers serves as a substantial deterrent to intellectual and financial investment by all sectors of the cancer community. In an effort to ultimately overcome these barriers, a Cancer Prevention Research Summit was assembled June 12–13, 2006 in Bethesda, Maryland, organized by C-Change with support from the AACR. The Summit brought together some 120 leaders from private, public, and not-for-profit entities, including cancer researchers and clinicians; federal health officials; regulatory agency representatives; pharmaceutical, biotech, and food industry leaders; patent attorneys; economists; public and private provider group executives; and advocates. Participants engaged in a detailed process to more carefully define the major barriers, identify potential solutions, and formulate initial priorities and recommendations for action. At the conclusion of this dialogue among experts, the following recommended actions were outlined: define policy solutions to patent, intellectual property, and liability law barriers; create an advisory document about the approval process for cancer chemopreventive agents and vaccines for the FDA; develop new design models for cancer chemopreventive clinical trials; outline the business case for chemopreventive agents and vaccines for federal research agencies, payors and investors; and implement a communications strategy to increase public awareness about the importance of chemoprevention and cancer preventive vaccines. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(24): 11540-9)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. G. Grabowski and J. L. Moe Impact of Economic, Regulatory, and Patent Policies on Innovation in Cancer Chemoprevention Cancer Prevention Research, July 1, 2008; 1(2): 84 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Rondanina, M. Puntoni, G. Severi, C. Varricchio, A. Zunino, I. Feroce, B. Bonanni, and A. Decensi Psychological and Clinical Factors Implicated in Decision Making About a Trial of Low-Dose Tamoxifen in Hormone Replacement Therapy Users J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2008; 26(9): 1537 - 1543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]