| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Priority Reports |
Department of Immunology, Institute for Cell Biology, Eberhard-Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Requests for reprints: Alexander Steinle, Department of Immunology, Institute for Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 15, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany. Phone: 49-7071-29-80992; Fax: 49-7071-29-5653; E-mail: alexander.steinle{at}uni-tuebingen.de.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ß T cells, and 
T cells in humans (1). In association with the adaptor protein DAP10, NKG2D transduces signals that activate or costimulate effector functions of these cytotoxic lymphocytes (13). A peculiarity of NKG2D consists in the multitude of ligands that are not constitutively expressed but rather are induced subsequently to harmful events like genotoxic stress or infection (36). Of note, NKG2D ligands (NKG2DL) are also frequently expressed on malignant cells but absent from the respective benign tissues rendering the NKG2D/NKG2DL system an interesting target for tumor immunotherapy (7, 8). In fact, recent studies in mice strongly support a stimulatory role of NKG2D for tumor immunity. NKG2DL expression is induced by carcinogens and genotoxic stress, and tumor cell lines transduced with mouse NKG2DL were readily eliminated in vivo due to NK and CD8 T-cell activity and induced tumor immunity against the parental cell line (6, 9, 10). Human NKG2DL belong to the two families of MHC class Irelated MIC and UL16-binding protein (ULBP) molecules, respectively (5). The MHC-encoded MICA and MICB molecules exhibit a highly restricted expression on healthy tissue in vivo but are broadly expressed on epithelial tumors and hematopoietic malignancies (7, 8, 11). Targeting cytotoxic lymphocytes towards MICA-expressing tumors is counteracted by proteolytic shedding of MICA molecules (12, 13). In addition, soluble MICA (sMICA) and transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) have been reported to systemically down-regulate NKG2D expression on cytotoxic lymphocytes providing another route of escape from NKG2D-mediated surveillance (12, 1416). Considerably less is known about the expression and regulation of ULBP molecules that differ from MIC molecules by the lack of an
3 domain. Like MIC molecules, ULBPs are expressed by many tumor cell lines and some hematological malignancies (8, 17). However, knowledge of expression of ULBP in vivo remains scarce. In contrast to MIC molecules, ULBP1-3 have been shown to be linked to the cell membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor similarly to their mouse counterparts, the RAE-1 molecules (5, 17). Previously, release of soluble ULBP2 (sULBP2)/ALCAN from some tumor cells in vitro has been reported (18), but neither the molecular mechanism of ULBP2 release nor its functional implications have been addressed. Here, we report that ULBP2 molecules are released from tumor cells by metalloproteases and can be detected in sera of patients with hematopoietic malignancies. | Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reagents. Anti-NKG2D (clone 139), anti-NKG2D-PE (clone H106.771), anti-ULBP2 (clone 165903), polyclonal anti-ULBP2, and ULBP2-Fc were from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Anti-mouse IgG1-PE conjugate (clone X40) and anti-CD80-FITC conjugate (clone BB1) were obtained from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Soluble human phycoerythrin-coupled NKG2D tetramers and anti-ULBP2 BUMO1 were produced as described elsewhere (4). Rabbit anti-goat horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate was from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA); anti-mouse IgG2a-HRP was from Southern Biotechnology Associates (Birmingham, AL); and goat anti-mouse IgG-coated microspheres were from Bangs Laboratories (Fishers, IN). Hydroxamate-based broad metalloprotease inhibitors matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor III (MMPI III; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and Batimastat (BB94; kind gift of Klaus Maskos, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany) were used. BB94 was dissolved in dimethylformamide and added as 1:200 volume to cultures. Phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) from Bacillus cereus, Brefeldin A, and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Flow cytometry. Cells were incubated with the anti-ULBP2 BUMO1 or mouse IgG1 at 10 µg/mL and then, after washing, with goat anti-mouse-PE conjugate (1:200) as secondary reagent, or, alternatively, with phycoerythrin-labeled soluble human NKG2D tetramers at 10 µg/mL. Samples were analyzed on a FACScan (BD Biosciences). Specific fluorescence intensities were calculated by subtracting the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the isotype control from the MFI of the specific antibody.
NKG2D down-regulation assay. NKL cells were cocultured for 24 hours with irradiated C1R transfectants at 1:1 ratio or with concentrated supernatants of C1R transfectants. Afterwards, cells were stained for NKG2D expression with NKG2D-PE or the respective isotype control. Cocultured C1R transfectants were excluded from histogram analysis by staining with FITC-conjugated anti-CD80. After washing, samples were analyzed on a FACScan.
NKG2D binding assay. Goat anti-mouse IgG-coated microspheres were incubated with 50 µg/mL anti-ULBP2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) BUMO1 or anti-MHC class I W6/32, respectively (8). After washing, microspheres were resuspended with concentrated supernatants of C1R-ULBP2 transfectants. Then, washed microspheres were stained with phycoerythrin-conjugated NKG2D or H2-Kd tetramers (4), respectively, and fluorescence was assessed by flow cytometry on a FACScan.
ELISA. For the detection of sULBP2, two monoclonal anti-ULBP2 mAb binding nonoverlapping ULBP2 epitopes were implemented. Plates were coated with the anti-ULBP2 mAb BUMO1 at 1 µg/mL in PBS, then blocked by addition of 50 µL of 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 hour at 37°C and washed. Afterwards, ULBP2-Fc (R&D Systems) and the samples were added, and the plates were incubated for 2 hours at 37°C. For analysis of patient samples, sera were diluted 1:3 in PBS before addition to the plates. After incubation, plates were washed, and the detection mAb anti-ULBP2 (R&D Systems) at 1 µg/mL in 1% BSA/PBS was added for 2 hours at 37°C. Plates were then washed, and anti-mouse IgG2a-HRP (1:10,000 in 3.25% BSA/PBS) was added for 1 hour at 37°C. Plates were then washed and developed using the Tetramethylbenzidine Peroxidase Substrate System (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD). The absorbance was measured at 450 nm. Results are shown as means with SD of triplicates. The ELISA procedure for sMICA has been previously described (8).
Immunoblot analysis. Samples were separated by 15% SDS-PAGE. Where indicated, samples were treated before with peptide:N-Glycanase F (PNGaseF; New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) for 1 hour at 37°C according to the manufacturer's instructions. Gels were blotted to Hybond-enhanced chemiluminescence membranes (Amersham, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom), blocked with TBS containing 5% nonfat dried milk, and then analyzed with 0.1 µg/mL anti-ULBP2 serum. Binding of anti-ULBP2 was detected with a rabbit anti-goat HRP-conjugate and chemiluminescence reagent (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL).
Chromium release assay. Cytotoxicity of NKL cells against 293T cells was assessed in a 2-hour 51Cr release assay. For NKG2D blockade, NKL cells were pretreated with mAb 139, and mAb139 was also added to the assay medium (10 µg/mL). Where indicated, 293T were pretreated with 10 µg Brefeldin A/mL and 100 ng PMA/mL for 12 and 11.5 hours, respectively, before labeling with 50 µCi of 51Cr (Amersham, Freiburg, Germany) for 1 hour at 37°C, and subsequently washed thrice before the assay. Calculation of % lysis = 100 x (experimental release spontaneous release) / (maximum release spontaneous release). Data are means of triplicates.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10 ng/mL) of sULBP2 within 16 hours of culture (Fig. 1B). Supernatants of mock-transfected C1R cells that express about 100-fold less ULBP2 endogenously (8) as well as supernatants of ULBP1-transfected and ULBP3-transfected gave rise to only weak signals underlining the specificity of the ELISA (Fig. 1B). In supernatants of several hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells lines expressing endogenous ULBP2, concentrations of sULBP2 roughly paralleled ULBP2 cell surface levels (Fig. 1C).
|
24 kDa; Fig. 1D). Deglycosylated sULBP2 detected in the C1R-ULBP2 supernatant was of even lower apparent molecular weight, suggesting enzymatic processing of the membrane-bound protein. ULBP2 is attached to the cell membrane by a GPI anchor, which previously was shown by treatment of ULBP2-transfected cells with PI-PLC (17). Enzymatic release of several GPI-linked proteins by phospholipases has been reported (19). Therefore, we treated C1R-ULBP2 transfectants with PI-PLC to analyze phospholipase-shed ULBP2 molecules. Unexpectedly, PNGaseF-treated supernatants of PI-PLCtreated C1R-ULBP2 cells contained an additional band of higher molecular weight corresponding to the ULBP2 species in cell lysates, suggesting that the naturally released sULBP2 is not generated by the activities of phospholipases (Fig. 1D).
ULBP2 molecules are released by metalloproteases. To address an involvement of metalloproteases in the shedding of ULBP2, we treated C1R-ULBP2 cells with MMPI III and observed a pronounced reduction of ULBP2 release correlating with increasing concentrations of the inhibitor (Fig. 2A). Similar data were obtained using the broad metalloprotease inhibitor batimastat (BB94) that has previously been tested in phase I/II trials in cancer patients. To verify that shedding by metalloproteases is not a peculiarity of C1R-ULBP2 transfectants, we treated Jurkat and 293T cells with MMPI III and BB94, respectively, and also found a dose-dependent reduction of ULBP2 levels in the respective supernatants (Fig. 2B; data not shown). Next, we investigated sULBP2 levels in supernatants of C1R-ULBP2 cells that were treated with bacterial phospholipase PI-PLC and detected
1.3-fold higher sULBP2 concentrations compared with supernatants of mock-treated cells (Fig. 2C). Whereas physiologic ULBP2 shedding was largely inhibited by BB94, there was only a slight reduction of sULBP2 levels in the supernatants of PI-PLCtreated C1R-ULBP2 cells, suggesting that BB94 does not affect the activity of phospholipases. Altogether, these data show that ULBP2 is released from tumor cells by metalloproteases and not by phospholipases.
|
|
100 ng/mL (Fig. 4C). We verified that our tumor cellderived sULBP2 was capable to interact with NKG2D by immobilizing ULBP2 from the supernatants of C1R-ULBP2 cells on protein Acoated microspheres and staining with fluorochrome-conjugated NKG2D tetramers (Fig. 4D). Accordingly, pretreating NKL cells with sULBP2 (100 ng/mL) for 24 hours did not affect cytotoxicity of NKL cells against 293T cells (data not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, TGF-
, and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor that are shed by members of the ADAM family of transmembrane metalloproteases (e.g., ADAM17; ref. 20). Current work in our laboratory investigates involvement of ADAMs in the shedding of NKG2DL. Proteolytic shedding of membrane proteins may either regulate cell surface expression levels and/or promote release of biological active soluble isoforms. For NKG2DL, regulation of cell surface expression is of crucial importance, because NKG2DL surface levels critically determine the susceptibility to NKG2D-stimulated cytolysis (9, 17). We show that PMA-induced shedding of ULBP2 results in markedly reduced ULBP2 surface levels and paralleled by reduced NKG2DL surface densities as well as impaired NKG2D-mediated NK lysis. Furthermore, sMICA from sera of tumor patients has also been described to cause a systemic impairment of antitumor cytotoxicity by down-regulation of NKG2D on peripheral CD8 T cells and NK cells (12, 16, 21). With regard to sULBP2, we did not observe down-regulation of NKG2D on NK cells using concentrations of tumor cellderived sULBP2 that were well above the concentrations in sera of patients with leukemia. Interestingly, we did not detect sULBP2 in sera of patients with gastrointestinal tumors, whereas sMICA was broadly detected in sera of patients with gastrointestinal and other epithelial tumors (12, 13, 16, 21). Although this may indicate that ULBP2 is primarily expressed and shed by malignant hematopoietic cells, several tumor cell lines of epithelial origin have also been reported to express ULBP molecules (17, 22). However, expression of ULBP by epithelial tumors in vivo has yet to be shown.
In summary, we here report that sULBP2 molecules originate from tumor cells by metalloproteolytic cleavage and are detectable in sera of some patients with leukemia. Shedding of ULBP2 reduces NKG2DL surface levels and may impair immunogenicity of tumor cells. Further studies have to address the molecular mechanics of ULBP2 cleavage, the relevance of ULBP shedding for tumor immunity, and the potential of sULBP as novel variable for diagnosis and/or prognosis in leukemia.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Wiebke Ruschmeier for excellent technical assistance and Cecile Gouttefangeas (Department of Immunology, Institute for Cell Biology, Eberhard-Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany), Andrea Peterfi, and Helmut Salih (Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany) for kindly providing sera of tumor patients.
Received 7/18/05. Revised 12/15/05. Accepted 1/ 6/06.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Paschen, A. Sucker, B. Hill, I. Moll, M. Zapatka, X. D. Nguyen, G. C. Sim, I. Gutmann, J. Hassel, J. C. Becker, et al. Differential Clinical Significance of Individual NKG2D Ligands in Melanoma: Soluble ULBP2 as an Indicator of Poor Prognosis Superior to S100B Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2009; 15(16): 5208 - 5215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hedlund, A.-C. Stenqvist, O. Nagaeva, L. Kjellberg, M. Wulff, V. Baranov, and L. Mincheva-Nilsson Human Placenta Expresses and Secretes NKG2D Ligands via Exosomes that Down-Modulate the Cognate Receptor Expression: Evidence for Immunosuppressive Function J. Immunol., July 1, 2009; 183(1): 340 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Roda-Navarro and H. T. Reyburn The Traffic of the NKG2D/Dap10 Receptor Complex during Natural Killer (NK) Cell Activation J. Biol. Chem., June 12, 2009; 284(24): 16463 - 16472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lundqvist, H. Yokoyama, A. Smith, M. Berg, and R. Childs Bortezomib treatment and regulatory T-cell depletion enhance the antitumor effects of adoptively infused NK cells Blood, June 11, 2009; 113(24): 6120 - 6127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cerboni, M. Ardolino, A. Santoni, and A. Zingoni Detuning CD8+ T lymphocytes by down-regulation of the activating receptor NKG2D: role of NKG2D ligands released by activated T cells Blood, March 26, 2009; 113(13): 2955 - 2964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Boutet, S. Aguera-Gonzalez, S. Atkinson, C. J. Pennington, D. R. Edwards, G. Murphy, H. T. Reyburn, and M. Vales-Gomez Cutting Edge: The Metalloproteinase ADAM17/TNF-{alpha}-Converting Enzyme Regulates Proteolytic Shedding of the MHC Class I-Related Chain B Protein J. Immunol., January 1, 2009; 182(1): 49 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Baltz, M. Krusch, T. Baessler, B. J. Schmiedel, A. Bringmann, P. Brossart, and H. R. Salih Neutralization of tumor-derived soluble Glucocorticoid-Induced TNFR-Related Protein ligand increases NK cell anti-tumor reactivity Blood, November 1, 2008; 112(9): 3735 - 3743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Waldhauer, D. Goehlsdorf, F. Gieseke, T. Weinschenk, M. Wittenbrink, A. Ludwig, S. Stevanovic, H.-G. Rammensee, and A. Steinle Tumor-Associated MICA Is Shed by ADAM Proteases Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 68(15): 6368 - 6376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Cao, X. Xi, Z. Wang, L. Dong, Z. Hao, L. Cui, C. Ma, and W. He Four novel ULBP splice variants are ligands for human NKG2D Int. Immunol., August 1, 2008; 20(8): 981 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Le Maux Chansac, D. Misse, C. Richon, I. Vergnon, M. Kubin, J.-C. Soria, A. Moretta, S. Chouaib, and F. Mami-Chouaib Potentiation of NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in human lung adenocarcinoma: role of NKG2D-dependent pathway Int. Immunol., July 1, 2008; 20(7): 801 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Siemens, N. Hu, A. K. Sheikhi, E. Chung, L. J. Frederiksen, H. Pross, and C. H. Graham Hypoxia Increases Tumor Cell Shedding of MHC Class I Chain-Related Molecule: Role of Nitric Oxide Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 68(12): 4746 - 4753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Clayton, J. P. Mitchell, J. Court, S. Linnane, M. D. Mason, and Z. Tabi Human Tumor-Derived Exosomes Down-Modulate NKG2D Expression J. Immunol., June 1, 2008; 180(11): 7249 - 7258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Armeanu, M. Krusch, K. M. Baltz, T. S. Weiss, I. Smirnow, A. Steinle, U. M. Lauer, M. Bitzer, and H. R. Salih Direct and Natural Killer Cell-Mediated Antitumor Effects of Low-Dose Bortezomib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 14(11): 3520 - 3528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Diermayr, H. Himmelreich, B. Durovic, A. Mathys-Schneeberger, U. Siegler, U. Langenkamp, J. Hofsteenge, A. Gratwohl, A. Tichelli, M. Paluszewska, et al. NKG2D ligand expression in AML increases in response to HDAC inhibitor valproic acid and contributes to allorecognition by NK-cell lines with single KIR-HLA class I specificities Blood, February 1, 2008; 111(3): 1428 - 1436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Maccalli, D. Nonaka, A. Piris, D. Pende, L. Rivoltini, C. Castelli, and G. Parmiani NKG2D-Mediated Antitumor Activity by Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Antigen-Specific T-Cell Clones Isolated from Melanoma Patients Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 13(24): 7459 - 7468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Porcu-Buisson, M. Lambert, L. Lyonnet, A. Loundou, M. Gamerre, L. Camoin-Jau, F. Dignat-George, S. Caillat-Zucman, and P. Paul Soluble MHC Class I chain-related molecule serum levels are predictive markers of implantation failure and successful term pregnancies following IVF Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2261 - 2266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Cao, X. Xi, Z. Hao, W. Li, Y. Kong, L. Cui, C. Ma, D. Ba, and W. He RAET1E2, a Soluble Isoform of the UL16-binding Protein RAET1E Produced by Tumor Cells, Inhibits NKG2D-mediated NK Cytotoxicity J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2007; 282(26): 18922 - 18928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Roda-Navarro and H. T. Reyburn Intercellular protein transfer at the NK cell immune synapse: mechanisms and physiological significance FASEB J, June 1, 2007; 21(8): 1636 - 1646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Suciu-Foca, N. Feirt, Q.-Y. Zhang, G. Vlad, Z. Liu, H. Lin, C.-C. Chang, E. K. Ho, A. I. Colovai, H. Kaufman, et al. Soluble Ig-Like Transcript 3 Inhibits Tumor Allograft Rejection in Humanized SCID Mice and T Cell Responses in Cancer Patients J. Immunol., June 1, 2007; 178(11): 7432 - 7441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lopez-Soto, A. Quinones-Lombrana, R. Lopez-Arbesu, C. Lopez-Larrea, and S. Gonzalez Transcriptional Regulation of ULBP1, a Human Ligand of the NKG2D Receptor J. Biol. Chem., October 13, 2006; 281(41): 30419 - 30430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Spreu, T. Stehle, and A. Steinle Human Cytomegalovirus-Encoded UL16 Discriminates MIC Molecules by Their {alpha}2 Domains. J. Immunol., September 1, 2006; 177(5): 3143 - 3149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Eisele, J. Wischhusen, M. Mittelbronn, R. Meyermann, I. Waldhauer, A. Steinle, M. Weller, and M. A. Friese TGF-{beta} and metalloproteinases differentially suppress NKG2D ligand surface expression on malignant glioma cells Brain, September 1, 2006; 129(9): 2416 - 2425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |